A Barrage Unlike Any Other- Photo Timeline of the Week in News

It is hard to believe that it has now been 3 weeks since Edward Snowden, the unassuming 30 year old computer technician, leaked classified intelligence about governmental spying programs. Following the acknowledgement of his responsibility and the divulging of his location, the assumption was that a major showdown would ensue between China and the United States. Snowden was front page news, but for a period the news plateaued, but spiked again when it was revealed that on Sunday, June 23rd Snowden arrived in Russia, adding a complicated but also appealing element. The outrage in the United States was swift, with accusations of recalcitrant behavior, and threats of consequences, which weren't exactly specified. Couple Snowden with the drama of Aaron Hernandez and George Zimmerman, and the three stories highlighted a week of inexorable news drama (especially June 26th), touching nearly every facet of society; the courts, race and race relations, same-sex marriage, sports, politics and geopolitics, voting rights, modern day heroes, affirmative action, guns, immigration, and privacy.

Timeline:

June 20th:

12:20PM-Sports Illustrated reports that 23-year-old Aaron Hernandez, tight end for the New England Patriots, who just signed a $40 million contract last year, is likely to be arrested following the murder of Odin Lloyd. Lloyd was found in an industrial park 1/2 mile from Hernandez's home in North Attleboro, MA with multiple gunshot wounds.

6:35PM-Wesley Lowery, from the Boston Globe, reports on Twitter that no arrest is imminent in the Aaron Hernandez case.

June 21st:

11:44AM-Numerous sources report that an arrest warrant for Aaron Hernandez has been prepared but the time when it will be served is still unknown. All reports suggest the charges will be for obstruction of justice, relating to Hernandez's destruction of his cell phone and home surveillance system days earlier.

~7PM-Washington Post reports that Edward Snowden will be charged with espionage, theft, and conversion of government property, each of which can carry a 10 year prison sentence.

June 22nd:

1:40PM-State authorities search Hernandez's sprawling mansion for a second time, spending approximately 3 1/2 hours in the home, and removing approximately fifteen bags of evidence.

June 23rd:

~9:30AM-The Guardian, which has been the lead newspaper in reporting on Snowden, says Snowden has arrived in Moscow, to Sheremetyevo Airport. Reports suggest Russia may be a quick stop in a journey to Ecuador, which is considering an asylum request.

6:50PM-Nelson Mandela, who had been admitted to a Pretoria hospital on June 8, is reportedly in "critical" condition as his health slowly worsens. Mandela, who is 94, is world famous for his role in ending Apartheid, as well as leading South Africa, in 1994, through a peaceful transition into a democratic country.

June 24th:

~10:00AM-The trial of George Zimmerman, the neighborhood watchman accused of murdering Travyon Martin, begins with opening statements. The prosecutor uses profanity in his opening statement while the defense uses an absurd "knock knock" joke. The trial, which has become a media sensation, has stoked racial tensions amid claims that Martin was targeted because he was black. Zimmerman claims that he acted in self-defense, evidenced, according to him, by multiple injuries on the night of the murder, presumably induced by Martin. A guilty verdict could send Zimmerman to jail for life while an acquittal could further inflame race relations in the country.

~10:00AM-The Supreme Court releases the opinion of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, which dealt with the constitutionality of affirmative action. Abigail Fisher, who is white, claimed that Texas's affirmative action policy, which uses race as a factor, among many, in determining admissions, discriminated against her. Concerns arose from many affirmative action supporters that the policy could be struck down but the Court punted the issue, sending it back to the lower court with directions to apply a test called "strict scrutiny."

11:29AM-Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's former Prime Minister, is found guilty and sentenced to seven years in prison, for having sex with an underage prostitute. The ruling also barred Berlusconi from public office indefinitely. However, in Italy's judicial system, there are still  two more layers of appeal before the sentence becomes final, and in all likelihood Berlusconi will not spend a day in jail. In 2012, Berlusconi was sentenced to four years in prison for tax fraud, but never served the sentence.

12:37PM-Jim Roberts, a Reuters executive, posts a photo to his Twitter account of an empty seat on a flight from Moscow to Havana. The plane is inundated with reporters, who believed Snowden would be on the flight. Instead, the empty seat becomes a symbol of the absurdity of the whole situation.

June 25th:

9:21AM-Reports begin to trickle out that the Court's decision in Windsor v. United States, the case involving DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act), will be revealed tomorrow (July 26). Hollingsworth v. Perry, regarding Prop 8 (a California voter initiative which defined marriage between one man and one woman), will also be released.

~10:00AM-The Supreme Court is poised to release opinions about gay marriage tomorrow but a major opinion about the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which has received far less attention, is released today. The 1965 Voting Rights Act was a huge piece of legislation, meant to ensure that minorities were not discriminated against at the voting booth. The part of the Act in question before the Court was called the preclearance requirement. The requirements means that any state or local government labeled as having a past history of discrimination must get approval from the federal government before making changes to voting laws. This is believed to have played a major role in ensuring that many areas, mostly in the South, could not disenfranchise black voters. And, in a historic decision, the Court guts the act, ruling it to be outdated, and while it didn't invalidate the preclearance requirement, it said the methods used to determine which states need to be precleared were unconstitutional, thus ending the preclearance requirement in a roundabout way.

~2:00PM-Just a couple hours after the Supreme Court guts the Voting Rights Act, Texas moves forward with redistricting plans and voter ID laws. The plans would disproportionately affect black and Hispanic voters and were blocked just last year under the now defunct Voting Rights Act.

11:27AM-During a visit to Finland, Russian President Vladimir Putin says that Edward Snowden is in the transit area of Sheremetyevo airport and is a "free man." Putin also adds the U.S. accusations against Moscow are "ravings and rubbish" and that Russian security agencies have not worked with Snowden.

June 26th:

12:58AM-Wendy Davis, a Texas state senator, successfully filibusters a sweeping abortion bill, becoming an overnight sensation. Texas, with the overwhelming support of Governor Rick Perry, was poised to pass a bill which would have effectively banned abortion after 20 weeks and tightened standards on abortion clinics resulting in the mass closure of such facilities. Davis stood speaking for about 11 hours, without a bathroom break. When republican lawmakers attempted a vote shortly before midnight, they were drowned out by raucous supporters of Davis, preventing the passage; Davis's effort and the event itself have become a cause celebre.

8:45AM-Aaron Hernandez is arrested. Many begin to speculate that Hernandez will be charged with murder, but Masschusetts State Police representatives tell reporters that charges will be released upon arraignment.

10:03AM-Jubilant supporters of same-sex marriage begin celebrating after hearing that the Court has ruled DOMA to be unconstitutional. The result is that couples who have been legally married in states which allow same-sex marriage will now be recognized as such by the federal government. Shortly after, the Court side steps the Prop 8 case, ruling that the Court did not have standing to hear it. The result is that the lower court's ruling stands, essentially legalizing gay marriage in California.

10:25AM-The New England Patriots announce, via Twitter, that they have released Aaron Hernandez. The release marks a precipitous and unprecedented fall from grace, for a young man who, just a couple weeks earlier, was known simply as one of the NFL's best tight ends. Now Hernandez has no team and is facing the likelihood of spending a significant amount of time in jail.

~12:00PM-Protestors and police clash in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, about one mile from a soccer stadium where Brazil was playing Uruguay, in a warm-up tournament for next year's FIFA World Cup. Protests have erupted all over the country, in response to what the protestors believe is wasteful government spending and corruption, stemming from Brazil's hosting of the World Cup next year and the Olympics in 2016. The protests are the largest in twenty years and have sparked fears of Brazil's possible inability to adequately host two major, international events. The also reveal a deeply fractured society, trying to balance huge economic growth, which has injected Brazil into the world stage, but has also left many residents wallowing in poverty.

~12:00PM-Rachel Jeantel, the star witness for the prosecution, takes the stand in the George Zimmerman trial. Jeantel was on the phone with Travyon Martin during the night he was killed and was the last person Martin spoke to before the altercation with Zimmerman. Jeantel is just 19 years old and was likely nervous as well as being emotionally scarred from talking to a friend just minutes before his death, and her testimony showed that. She was combative at times and difficult to understand at others. She was the target of ridicule on social media following her testimony for her appearance (she is overweight) and for her admitted inability to read cursive. As it so happens, Jeantel speaks two other languages, Spanish and Haitian Creole, in addition to English, and the prosecution highlighted this because, according to New Yorker writer Jelani Cobb, Jeantel's intelligence was also being questioned. Jeantel claimed that Travyon said a "creepy-ass cracker" was watching him and in response to a question from the defense about the possibility of Martin lying about his location, she said "that's real retarded, sir."

~3:30PM-Aaron Hernandez is arraigned and officially charged with 6 felonies, including murder and 5 other weapons charges. Prosecutors claim Hernandez orchestrated Lloyd's murder and have ample evidence, including text messages and surveillance video of Hernandez brandishing a firearm on the night/morning of the murder.

~3:45PM-Nelson Mandela, according to a report from CNN, is on life support. Jacob Zuma, South Africa's President, cancels travel plans out of fears of Mandela's death. The day before, Mandela's daughter, in an interview with CNN, said that she believes her father "is at peace."

6:14PM-Turkey protest continues, stemming from the planned demolition of Gezi Park, one of the last few green spaces in Istanbul. The government asks Twitter to open up an office in the country to better communicate, so that requests to take down material can be streamlined. Turkish Prime Minister, Tayyip Erdogan has railed about the sinister nature of Twitter calling it a "scourge" used to spread lies about the government with the aim of terrorizing society.

7:09PM-Since Snowden is technically not in Russia and only in the transit area, Vladimir Putin says he cannot honor the U.S. extradition request. Meanwhile, Ecuador is reviewing requests for asylum and asked the United States to submit any objections as part of Ecuador's "thorough review process."

June 27th:

9:08AM- President Obama, who is on a trip to Africa, and currently in Senegal, tells the press that he believes Snowden has more documents but didn't know exactly what documents they may be. He adds, somewhat nonchalantly, that he will not "be scrambling jets to get a 29-year-old hacker."

2:49PM-Aaron Hernandez is brought before the court and denied bail, after Superior Court Judge Renee Dupuis, mentioned the possibility of Hernandez being a flight risk.

5:39PM-Numerous outlets, including Bloomberg, report that a protestor from the previous day's demonstrations in Brazil died, bringing the total to six over the past three weeks

10:37PM-Numerous outlets, including NBC, publish reports that Hernandez is being probed for a possible link to two other murders. On July 16, 2012 two men were killed in a drive-by shooting after leaving a Boston night club, while a third man was shot but survived. Theories pop up that Hernandez may have killed Lloyd because of knowledge about the other murders, although there is no factual basis to support the claims at this point.

June 28th:

2:03PM-Ecuadorean President, Rafael Correa, is reportedly reconsidering whether to be involved in the Edward Snowden controversy. Correa was supposedly upset with the role that Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, was playing in the asylum request. Ecuadorean government officials were worried Assange would overshadow them, claiming it appeared as though Assange was "running the show." The result was that a temporary travel document, which could have landed Snowden in Ecuador, was revoked, greatly muddying the entire situation. Ecuador, as you would expect, has been and continues to receive great pressure from U.S. government officials.

2:08PM-A third man is arrested in connection with the shooting death of Odin Lloyd. Carlos Ortiz, who lives in Bristol, Connecticut, the same place where Hernandez was born, is charged with carrying an unlicensed firearm. Another man, Ernest Wallace, was also arrested in Florida in connection with Lloyd's death, ramping up speculation that plea deals, in exchange for testimony against Hernandez are possible. All three men have ties to Bristol, Connecticut.

3:35PM-Reuters reports that Mandela's health, according to his ex-wife, has shown "great improvement" but cautioned that he was still "clinically unwell." Meanwhile, President Obama, who is in Africa, stated he didn't want to be intrusive, while also noted that Mandela was his "personal hero."

~11:59PM-Huge protests erupt in Egypt, on the first anniversary of Morsi's inauguration. Opposition protestors clash with Morsi supporters as at least 85 are injured and 5 Muslim Brotherhood offices are burned. The opposition claims, and rightfully so, that they have been systematically denied the right to participate in the forming of the new government. Following elections in which Islamic parties won the majority of votes, the drafting of the new constitution became a debacle. Attempts by more liberal and secular groups to have influence on the drafting were thwarted, as Islamic groups, especially the ultra-conservative Salafists, aimed to insert Islamic law into every provision. Reports surface that 2 people have died in the protests, including one American. 21 year old Andrew Proctor, of Chevy Chase, Maryland was in Egypt as part of an internship teaching English. He was reportedly stabbed in the chest.

Editor's note: Times are approximate and often reflect the posting of the article onto the Internet. They are not meant to express the exact time that the event occurred. If there is a mistake please alert me.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some thoughts on the stories:

Aaron Hernandez: 

What a sad fall from grace. Obviously, the real tragedy is the death of a 27 year old man, but Hernandez, at least for Patriot's fans, is especially troubling because of the organization’s belief that Hernandez was a changed man, raising an infant daughter, and becoming a rolemodel for young Hispanics. This was manifested in the $40 million contract Hernandez signed just last year, but also in the comments made by Patriot’s owner, Robert Kraft, after Hernandez signed the deal. Kraft said, in part, that Hernandez was "a super player, and a really first-class guy...Some people might see all the tattoos on him and think...Maybe 10 years ago I was in the class, (now) I think 'Wow, this guy's a good guy.' And we made a big commitment to him." After Hernandez signed the huge deal, he donated $50,000 to Kraft's charity and said that Kraft "changed my life."

What is so saddening about the Hernandez situation, besides the iniquity of murdering another human being, is that Hernandez, his two accomplices, and Lloyd have now become another statistic or will become another statistic in the inexorable violence that has plagued minority communities. Yet, this case is especially baffling because while the statistics would suggest that minorities are particularly violent, this is untrue; the most common thread is socioeconomics, and Hernandez just signed a $40 million deal. Why throw it all away by murdering (allegedly) an acquaintance just ½ mile from your own home? It leads you to believe that this murder is not some facile killing, but rather goes much deeper and involves a number of other people, and may relate to an unsolved double murder from 2012. Now, in all likelihood, Hernandez’s infant daughter, who he said had greatly changed him, will become just another number, another child growing up while her father sits in a jail.

Hernandez’s murder indictment coincides with the NFL's rookie symposium. It also coincides with two other incidents involving NFL players in the past week. Browns (now former) rookie linebacker, Ausar Walcott, was charged with attempted murder after punching a man in the face, sending him into a coma. Colt's safety, Joe Lefeged was arrested in Washington D.C. on weapons charges, after a semi-automatic pistol was found in the car he was riding in. It would seem that the travails of Hernandez could be didactic for the young and impressionable rookies at the NFL symposium, who have committed to a sport which pays very well, but brings a number of possible consequences, not the least of which is one’s health. But it is too simple to preach rectitude and expect it to occur. These young men often come from troubled backgrounds, living in troubled neighborhoods, growing up in broken families, and are often accustomed to violence. Now, they will, in all likelihood, spend their careers playing the world’s most violent sport, in which the strongest men on Earth bang heads against each other causing long-term irreparable harm. Couple that with the huge influx of cash and many young players are set up in a position to fail. Don’t forget, Aaron Hernandez is just 23 years old. My age. Thus, my point is simply that guns and violence is not something that will dissipate into thin air. It will continue. As long as these young men, who come from troubled backgrounds, thrust themselves into a sport in which they are expected to be violent, violence in the NFL is inevitable.

George Zimmerman trial:

This trial and others like it that have received major notoriety, like Casey Anthony, Scott Peterson, and Michael Jackson, are so utterly American, it is hard to imagine a better encapsulation. The drama, the media, the privacy invasion, the openness, the adversarial nature, the embodiment of larger societal issues; all of it wrapped in a small room in Sanford, Florida, revolving around one man: George Zimmerman.

The story is well known now. George Zimmerman is a neighborhood watchman. He sees a young man, wearing a hoodie, walking “suspiciously” in his development. He calls 911. He tells the dispatch operator about the situation and tacitly confirms he is following Martin. Martin is also on the phone with someone, a friend, mentioned above, by the name of Rachel Jeantel. Martin tells Jeantel that someone is following him, calling Zimmerman a “creepy-ass cracker.” A fight ensues. Zimmerman sustains facial and head injuries and Martin is shot dead. I think my initial thoughts were that Zimmerman was a white Jew and I was a tad bit worried. As it turns out, Zimmerman is Hispanic, but once the story hit the news, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson had already trumpeted the tragedy of another example of the ubiquitous racism that permeates society.

The truth about this whole trial is that the incident itself, in which Martin was killed, says far less about race (if anything at all) in America than the reaction to the shooting. The reaction shows the constant and persistent bubbling of racial tensions, percolating just below the surface, waiting for a small crack with which to leak out. The reactions often feel pre-planned, even prescient, with slight alterations depending on the nature of the incident. The unfortunate reality is that racism still exists, often in a systematic nature, a sort of languid evil, and we should work hard to eradicate it. But when it comes to violence and guns, it is not white people that pose the biggest danger to young black men, like Travyon Martin; the real danger to young black men is other young black men. While the murder of Martin is tragic, it has received far more attention than the other murders taking place in our country's inner cities. Yesterday, a man was shot and injured in Chicago; the man is a suspect in a double murder that left a 5-year-old child and his 31-year-old mother dead. Nobody seems to care. Our society seems content in allowing entire neighborhoods to become war zones, cutting down innocence at every turn. This is where our focus should lie, not on some media circus; a fabricated drama which is less the result of racial prejudice, and more the consequence of an atrocious and detestable gun law which ensures that trivial arguments, which at worst leave someone bloodied (like George Zimmerman) turn into deadly shootings, leaving a 17 year old dead and a family ripped apart.

Torino, Italy, and Europe: Contradictions Galore

Five whole weeks have elapsed since my arrival in Torino on an overcast and rainy Thursday afternoon. Within a few minutes of my arrival, I quickly oriented myself to the boundless rain that had drenched the city all spring. Every resident I met seemed eager to sneak in some remark, in broken Italian, about how “this most rain we see in 200 hundred year,” as they cuffed their fingers towards the sky at no one in particular. For the first week it rained, in some capacity almost every day. The rain was always steady, never a downpour and never a drizzle, but rather a constant diet of frustration and demoralization. And then, a week after my arrival, possibly in an effort to mollify the city’s residents, the sun showed his bright and beautiful face, and with it, an inexorable increase in the city’s collective happiness.

Torino sits in the Northwest corner of Italy, not far from the borders of Switzerland and France, hugging a handful of the innumerable and majestic mountain ranges that make up the Alps. It was once the site of the first Parliament and the capital of a newly formed Italy, although that title would last just 4 years. It is in many respects an isolated city, self-sustaining and untouched, with a hint of banality compared to other Italian cities. That is not to say that Torino is lacking in charm, but rather that it feels somewhat normal compared to the inexhaustible splendor one may find on the streets of Rome, Florence, or Venice. Torino is Italy’s fourth largest city, with around 1 million inhabitants and a metropolitan area about twice that size. The closest major city is Milan, about 90 miles to the west, but there is little within the general vicinity of the city that would come up as "must-see" in an Italian travel guide. The notoriety the city has received is mostly due to it being the site of the famous Shroud, its hosting of the 2006 Winter Olympics and for being the headquarters of Italian car giant, Fiat.

My experiences thus far have come through two prisms. The first is through my experience at the University of Torino, where I am doing research for a professor about the vast intricacies of comparative health law. The second is through my experience living in the center of the city, renting an apartment from a 70 year old woman named Silvia who also lives next door and who I think is convinced that I am her long lost grandson.

Torino recently built a brand new, enormous, and stunning campus on the banks of one of Torino’s three rivers. The building is shaped somewhat like the exterior of a tennis racket, surrounding an outdoors area with elevated patches of grass and intersecting walkways. It gives off the feel of a research laboratory or office building with dark, reflecting windows and a very uniform design. The most noticeable aspect is probably the white roof, which extends over the sides of the building and looks kind of like a flying saucer. The enormous structure can be seen from the outskirts of the city standing out from the rest of Torino’s somewhat monotonous architecture.  I work mostly in an office, which is supposed to be for the head of the Legal department. But since the building is brand new and the school is in flux, nobody was using it, so I get a nice, corner office with a view of the entire campus.

My apartment sits on the far side of the river in Gran Madre Square, a lively piazza, which is home to a magnificent and luminous church, modeled after the Pantheon in Rome. I have a view of the main body of water in the city, the Po River, and if the clouds stay in hiding, the snow tipped mountains can be seen in the distance. I am on what is oft described as the “bourgeois” part of town, with the rolling hills behind me, spotted with the ostentatious residences of the city’s wealthiest and most powerful. Indeed, the professor whom I work for owns a house in the hills, which is too marvelous to describe in words. The gated house on a narrow, windy road looks down upon the city and has a spacious yard and blossoming garden, providing views of the Alps that could leave the most talkative man feeling slightly laconic. About twenty minutes walking from my apartment, directly uphill, a beautiful park is tucked neatly to the side of another windy and narrow road, and possesses remarkable views of the city and the countryside, with a tree covered walkway reminiscent of Alice in Wonderland.

In addition to the unparalleled scenery and landscape, my experiences with the residents of Torino have been eye opening. My first visit to Italy was during a semester abroad in Florence during spring of 2010. There was nothing about my visit to Florence that I would alter in any fashion; it would be a disservice to my memory to bear any regret about my time there. But Florence is a city that is built primarily to serve the visitors who flock in droves to see the birthplace of the Renaissance. The visitors overwhelm the city most of the year, and most residents, in their interactions with Americans, seek little more than casual talk or the exchange of monetary instruments. In addition, I had almost no interactions with Florentine college students who were mostly non-existent. While I was always aware I was physically in Italy, the number of study abroad students could easily mistake you into thinking you were living in a very upscale college Shtetl. It was perfect for what I wanted at the time, but it prevented a full immersion into the lives of everyday Italians. Torino, on the other hand, provides a welcome contrast.

Torino is a city that enjoys relative anonymity, compared to other parts of Italy, but has worked and continues to work to become another major Italian tourism powerhouse. There is no better example of this than the 2006 Winter Olympics. Torino hoped the event would provide a platform to promulgate the city’s vast offerings, in addition to improving its aging and outdated infrastructure. While precise numbers are impossible to quantify most speculate that the city saw a modest bump immediately following the event, but now 7 years later, Torino remains low on the list of Italian tourism destinations. Once again, that says little about Torino other than it is situated in a neighborhood with stiff tourism competition. But, nobody here seems to mind, and neither do I. In fact, the lack of tourism is reason alone to cherish what the city has to offer. The city provides a welcome respite from other Italian cities which have a myriad of foreign tour groups at every corner, with their ridiculous matching flags or visors, and a guide who leads them with that darned raised umbrella. The city feels unspoiled and true, tucked away from the rest of the country, surreptitiously hiding among the mountains. 

But while there is certainly much to celebrate regarding Torino’s scenery or lack of tourist inundation, my interactions with the people have shaped my thoughts more so than anything else. Since the first day of my arrival, every person has been genuine, warm, and inviting, extending a hand to help in any fashion I deemed to be necessary. Every student I have been introduced to not only says hi to me in the hallway, but will make an effort to invite me for drinks or to get a coffee, just to see if everything is going okay. A law student who I was introduced to at the University, invited me to his house during my first week and introduced me to all of his friends, graciously driving me around the city. Silvia, the 70 year old woman who I am renting an apartment from (I call her my host-grandmother) is constantly inviting me to events and giving my number and email to different relatives, all of whom have invited me to their house. Oddly enough, Silvia revealed to me that she is actually half-Jewish. Her father was originally from Poland, but immigrated to Canada and Silvia was raised Catholic, solely by her mother. Just last weekend, I was invited to dinner at the house of one of Silvia’s daughters, who served fresh bread, Greek Salad, two types of Risotto, and Veal. My professors have also showed me incredible hospitality. Bianca, who is the professor I am working for, graciously invited me to her house for lunch, serving delectable fresh salad and gnocchi. Another professor, who I have been helping to proofread a document on legal drafting, has brought me to her house twice for lunch to feast on gnocchi, risotto, fish, veal, and fresh fruit. And then, without really asking, she took me on a tour of the area where she lived, in the “bourgeois” section of town, showing me the church where her children were baptized, with stunning views of the countryside and the Italian town of Chieri.

There is something about Italy that strikes a chord with me, something difficult to describe, enigmatic in a sense. In Boston or New York you can go to the North End or Little Italy, but it leaves a void; it wets your appetite but leaves you yearning for more. In all honesty, and I know it sounds so obvious, the beauty and wonder of Italy is simply being in Italy. It is a country so quick to mesmerize, leaving wide-eyes and blank stares to fill the ancient cobblestone streets.  Italian customs and traditions, seemingly so alien upon your arrival, yet so quickly accepted as normal you forget there was even an alternative. The drivers, who seem to not understand basic traffic rules and functions, routinely running red lights, cursing the car behind them making loud noises that just so happens to be an ambulance. The local businesses, who operate on no specific schedule, open when the owner decides to arrive. The supermarkets, leaving you to wonder whether America invented the idea of having more than one cashier line. The food, my God, the food surprises and bewilders me after every taste. Whether it be the rich flavor of Gelato, the crispness of a freshly made Cappuccino, or creamy, homemade Risotto from an Italian mother, your taste buds are always feeling enlivened. The cigarette smoke, which envelopes your every movement and the buds that litter the ground, your constant reminder that Italians do indeed cling to tradition. The artwork, monuments, and sculptures, adorning ordinary buildings, creating a mundanity bordering on the absurd. The immense history underneath your toes; the previous home of today’s modern world. I love it all.

In short, my experiences with Torino and its people have been nothing short of stellar.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

However, there is much more to tell. And unfortunately it is not all positive. I chose to ignore my surroundings when I visited Florence in 2010, locking myself in my own bubble of study abroad utopia, pretending the cities I visited were erected solely for my enjoyment. Now, three and a half years later, I have opened my eyes to the realities of the situation here, in an effort to understand not only the museums and monuments, but the people, the politics, and the social cohesion. I wish I could tell you that everything here is perfect and that the people are jovial, but that is simply not the case. What I have found is a country and continent rife with intolerance attempting to battle the endemic racism and xenophobia that permeates society. As the recession continues, and worsens, leaving many without jobs, tough times have given rise to politics reminiscent of Europe’s darkest days. In all honesty, it is difficult for me to write about all this, given my affection towards Italy and the rest of Europe. The truth is that I feel somewhat selfish since I have never personally been a victim, and instead I travel around Europe in relative comfort simply as another American tourist. There are so many warm, kind, and caring people that I have met, but as is often the case, the only voices you hear are a small impassioned few.

My experience in Italy has revealed a deeply fractured society, struggling, in many respects, to reconcile tradition and modernism. The Catholic Church, whose adherents number over 1 billion, is omnipresent in a country in which nearly 90% of its residents are Catholic. The results are predictable. While Europe and the United States have liberalized their views on gay marriage (France legalized it just last month) Italy still doesn’t protect homosexuals under anti-discrimination laws. The question isn’t whether gay marriage will be legal anytime soon in Italy, but rather if it will even become a topic of debate. Italy’s conservatism, which emanates from the Church, is pervasive and entrenched in Italian society, championing traditional familial structures and the gender roles that follow. Within the government, Italy’s female ministers have been the target of death threats, with an upsurge recently due to a large influx of women into the new government. Italy’s former prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, has made a series of offensive remarks directed at women, stating in part, that women are “God’s most beautiful gift to men” and that in order to prevent rape “we would need as many soldiers as there are beautiful women”, not to mention calling Angela Merkel, Germany’s Chancellor, a “unf**able lard-ass”. Italy has also struggled to protect women, with estimates suggesting that 1/3 of Italian women are victims of domestic abuse (the number is probably higher). Italy has also seen a spate of deadly violence against women. The UN estimates that in 2012, 120 women were killed by their husbands, exes, or boyfriends, approximately 1 murder every three days. After the brutal murder of a fifteen year old girl in Calabria just last month, Italy’s chamber of deputies ratified a treaty which aims to combat violence against women, taking a small, but important step towards tackling the problem.

To complicate those efforts, the divide between North and South has added an almost intractable element. While the two regions are connected and part of the same country, their relationship is disparate, pitting the industrialized North against the underdeveloped and crime-ridden South. The corrosive influence of organized crime, which has infiltrated vast areas of Italy’s politics (Silvio Berlusconi has often been associated with the Mafia)  and economy, has its stronghold in the South, in places like Sicily (Cosa Nostra), Campania (Camorra), Calabria (‘Ndrangheta), and Apulia (Sacra Corona Unita). Naples, the capital of Campania and Italy’s third largest city, is ground zero for Italy’s woes; the city is essentially controlled by the Mafia. The city suffers from high unemployment, elevated crime levels, endemic drug use, and serious health and environmental issues stemming from illegal waste dumping. I was recently told that organized crime has begun infiltrating Milan and Torino, seizing on poor oversight of government projects, essentially stealing public money. Poor oversight has also led to almost non-existent tax revenue from areas of the South, resulting in a giant burden being placed on Northern residents. To add insult to injury, the North often subsidizes large swaths of the South’s impoverished areas, even as the Mafia eats away at a shrinking economy. This creates a predictable animosity and frustration, leaving Northern residents feeling helpless, unable to penetrate the often opaque use of public funds and unable to hold anyone accountable. It is eerily reminiscent of Franz Kafka’s classic, The Trial, except adjusted to fit an entire country.

While these issues are of grave urgency, the most salient and pressing problem is intolerance, in the form of anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and racism, which have presented itself as a major problem in Italy and across Europe.

Relating Judaism to my experiences is always interesting in Europe for a number of obvious reasons. My experiences with Judaism actually began in the States, with my professor who set me up with this internship, and who is originally from Torino. She has an odd fascination with Jews, which became apparent during both classes I have taken with her. Not only does she have an obsession with Justice Benjamin Cardozo (Yeshiva law school is named after him) but she always seemed apt to mention if an important legal thinker came from a Jewish background (and there are a lot). What I didn’t know, and would later find out, is that Bianca, who my professor in the States set me up with, is Jewish, 1 of maybe 1,000 Jews in the entire city. When I visited her house, I couldn’t help but feel that I was in some American suburban Jewish home, which was adorned with different Jewish symbols. When I asked for a book to read, she gave me “The Lost” by Daniel Mendelsohn, which tells the story of the author’s quest to find out what happened to his relatives during the Holocaust. Her husband was travelling at the time, attending a Jewish conference in Vienna.

I also asked her about anti-Semitism in Europe and more specifically in Torino. She commented that her family and the Jewish community had never really experienced any problems in Torino, pointing to their small stature (they make up 1/1000^th of the population) and the tolerant nature of the community. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for other parts of Europe. In 2010, during my first trip to Italy, I was made aware of an incident in Florence a year earlier, in which a bomb was left outside of the Chabad House, a half a block from the Synagogue. When I travelled to Paris in 2010 I visited a Parisian friend who used to attend my overnight camp. His last name is Israel, a pretty easy giveaway of his religion, and he explicitly mentioned how much of a problem anti-Semitism was in France. He even suggested that at some point he would have to move, either to Israel or the United States, because it was so bad. Much of the recent trepidation among French Jews can be traced initially to the brutal kidnapping and murder of Ilan Halimi in 2006 by a Muslim gang. But since 2006, anti-Semitism has only gotten worse, culminating in another brutal attack by a Muslim extremist in Toulouse, which killed a Rabbi and three children, in March of 2012. Just a few months later, a Jewish supermarket was attacked in Sarcelles, a suburb of Paris. In 2012, according to a report by the SPCJ (the security unit of France’s Jewish community) anti-Semitic acts increased 58% from the previous year, to an astonishing 614.

But, this trend is not confined solely to France. Now, three years after my first trip, anti-Semitism is rapidly increasing across all over Europe prevalent among a growing contingent of resurgent right wing groups and immigrants, mostly Muslim, from Africa and the Middle East. Huge upsurges in anti-Semitism have been seen in the Swedish city of Malmo, which has a burgeoning immigrant population, in Hungary, where the right-wing Jobbik party is the country’s third largest, in Greece, where the Golden Dawn party has gained popularity, and in Ukraine, with the nationalist Svoboda party. Last month, one of Britain’s first Muslim ministers blamed his sentencing follow a driving accident on a “Jewish conspiracy."  And to see how it’s all come full-circle, in Germany, just a couple weeks ago, a rabbi was attacked near Frankfurt and called a “shitty Jew."

Some have said there is ample room for comparing Europe in the late 1920s and early 1930s, when the Great Depression hit, to Europe in the present day. Certainly, the economic situation is as dire then as it is now. Unemployment continues to rise throughout Europe, reaching over 25% in Spain and Greece and youth unemployment is even worse. In Italy, youth unemployment has reached 40%; in Spain the number is over 50%; and in Greece it is nearly 60%. This is especially problematic because young minds, when times are bad, tend to turn to ideas they do not fully understand. In Europe, these young minds are far more likely to turn to the far right of the political spectrum looking for someone or something to blame. In many instances they blame the government, but fringe groups seize on fear and uncertainty, enabling them to grow, ultimately blaming outsiders or immigration with the Jews being thrown into the mix. But, the threats to Jews are not the same existential threats of the 1930s. Instead, it is a more a persistent, inchoate threat, which continuously raises fear and apprehension but will likely never reach the same level as it once did; there is no threat of another European Holocaust. This, of course, does not make European anti-Semitism any better now than it was 75 years ago; it is rather that our recognition of the need to be prescient and our understanding of the iniquity of placation have given us an ability to react differently than we did in 1938.

I don’t mean to sound morbid, or to suggest that the situation here, as a whole, is dire. But in some areas, for many Jews, particularly religious Jews who wear Kippot or Tzitzit, it has, as Lyon’s Chief Rabbi remarked, become “unbearable.” France, however, is somewhat unique. France has the largest Jewish population in Europe, and the largest outside of Israel and the United States, with somewhere between 500,000 and 600,000 Jews. As my professor noted, the size and visibility of the Jewish population makes a big difference. In Italy there are only about 30,000 Jews, with half of them in Rome, so Italians are not intent to focus on the community. Instead, Italians have focused on another minority group, recent immigrants.

Due to its proximity to North Africa, Italy has seen a major influx of refugees, none of whom are white and many of whom are Muslim, which has rankled a country well known for its homogeneity. In Torino, for example, a number of refugees were essentially dumped in the city barely speaking a word of Italian, with no place to go and no money. I was invited to see the situation by Silvia’s granddaughter, who helped organize an event for the recent immigrants to provide food and other donations. They were all wearing donated clothing and lived in the now abandoned Olympic village as squatters, ignored by the community, and left to sit around all day. One of the recent immigrants spoke some Italian and engaged a couple of Italian students who I was talking to. He appeared to be high or drunk, and I later learned he was lamenting the treatment he and many others had received. They couldn’t find work and nobody seemed willing to help them. They were living in very close quarters in what were essentially abandoned buildings, with many making their living selling knock off leather goods or umbrellas. To put it in perspective, while Torino’s residents decry the incessant rain, its recent immigrants depend upon it.

Unsurprisingly, the plight of these recent immigrants has been met mostly with apathy, but there are many who are opposed to immigration completely. The most vocal political group is probably Lega Nord, whose main focus is on splitting the North and the South of Italy, but who invariably reject the legitimacy of immigration. The group routinely undergoes offensive campaigns to espouse support for their views. During a poster campaign, the group compared the perils of immigration to the plight of American Indians. The posters show a picture of an American Indian with a caption that says, “They suffered immigration. Now they live in reservations.”  On their Facebook page, the group once had a game called “Bounce the Illegal Immigrants,” in which players had to click on boats of illegal immigrants in an attempt to make them disappear. Following the historic appointment of Cecile Kyenge, the country’s first black government minister, the response was quick and vitriolic. Petitions were signed denouncing her and her effort to make the country more hospitable to recent immigrants. Mario Borghezio, a Lega Nord member, was recently kicked out of the Eurosceptic Europe of Freedom and Democracy Group for disparaging remarks made towards Kyenge. Barghezio said in part that she wanted to impose “tribal traditions” on Italy and that “Africa hasn’t produced great geniuses as anyone can see from a Mickey Mouse encyclopedia.”

The debate sizzled just last month when a Ghanaian immigrant, Mada Kabobo, killed one and injured four during a rampage with an axe in Milan. Milan is in the Lombardy region of Italy, a stronghold of Lega Nord, and their offshoot Lega Lombarda. The reaction was swift, especially towards Cecile Kyenge. Matteo Salvini, a Lega Lombarda politician, was quoted as saying, “The illegal immigrants the colored minister wants to regularize, kill people with pickaxes.” Following his arrest, Kabobo’s first words to police were allegedly, “I am hungry.” While it appears as though Lega Nord’s prominence may be slightly decreasing, their party is actually in power in the region of Piedmont, where Torino is located. While Torino has always voted towards the left, the rural areas around the city have propelled Lega Nord representative Roberto Cota to the Presidency of the region. The same is true for Lombardy, Italy’s most populated region. While Milan has voted towards the left, the president of the region, Roberto Maroni, is also from Lega Nord.

In Italy there is an open, accepted racism that can often feel somewhat surreal. This is no more evident than in sports. Soccer is, like every other European country, a national pastime. Yet, Italy has been mired in racism problems for years. The tend to center around a small number of hardline fans, known collectively as “Ultras”, who make up just a fraction of a team’s fan base but are the loudest and most vocal group in the stadium. They often yell racist epithets at players and display repulsive posters and banners aimed at Blacks and Jews. This behavior goes back decades, a haunting reminder that a small number of Italians appear to have learned nothing from the days of Fascism.

The team most notorious for their section of “Ultras” may be Lazio who has a fierce rivalry with Roma due to both teams location in Italy’s capital city. The full name of the soccer club is Societa Sportiva Lazio, but it is often initialed as S.S. Lazio and its symbol is an eagle, a constant reminder of the club’s ties to former Italian leader, Benito Mussolini.  Mussolini was a well-documented supporter of Lazio and elements of the club still retain some Fascist leanings, evidenced by a litany of racism and anti-Semitism. Ultras at Lazio will often display swastikas, Celtic crosses and other Fascist symbols during home games. In 1998, Ultras unfurled a banner reading, “Auschwitz is your country, the gas chambers are your home.” In 2000, they unfurled another banner which read, “Honor to the Tiger Arkan,” an homage to Serbian war criminal, Zeljko Raznatovic. One of Lazio’s former stars, Sinisa Mihajlovic, was an outspoken supporter of Raznatovic as well as former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic. In 2000, Mihajlovic was accused of calling Patrick Vieira a “black bastard” and “black monkey” but he denied he did so instead saying he called him “black shit.” Following his playing career, Mihajlovic got into coaching, eventually becoming the head of Fiorentina in June 2010 (just two weeks after I left Florence) and then taking a job as head coach of the Serbian National Team in 2012, a position he holds today. In 2005, another Lazio star, Paolo di Canio, inserted himself into a whirlwind of controversy when he appeared to give the Fascist salute to Lazio Ultras after scoring a goal. After major blowback from soccer officials, di Canio sought to clarify his behavior, stating, “I am a fascist, not a racist,” and praised Mussolini in his biography, saying he was, “basically a very principled, ethical individual.” Di Canio has a tattoo of the word Dux on his arm which is the Latin equivalent of Duce and is the current manager of English soccer club, Sunderland. In September of 2012, Lazio was fined after its fans taunted black players from English football club, Tottenham. Just two months later during another match with Tottenham, Ultras directed their ire towards the Jews, chanting “Juden Tottenham, Juden Tottenham.” Tottenham is often a target from clubs all over Europe because of their large Jewish following. In November of 2012, fans from Tottenham were attacked in Rome, greeted with Nazi salutes, resulting in one fan being stabbed. Just a few months ago, supporters of Tottenham were attacked again, this time in Lyon, greeted by more Nazi salutes. The list goes on.

Within Italy as a whole, the racism debate often revolves around one man: Mario Balotelli. Balotelli was born in Southern Italy to Ghanian parents, and ironically enough, raised since the age of 3 by Jewish Italians in Northern Italy. Balotelli is actually younger than I am, born in 1990, and thus has been subjected to abuse since he turned professional as a teenager (and probably before). Due to Italy’s strict rules regarding citizenship, he had to wait until his 18^th birthday to officially become a citizen, although he was born in Palermo and has lived his entire life in Italy. Balotelli is widely considered Italy’s best offensive player, but even in a country deathly obsessed with soccer, some Italians are reticent to accept Balotelli simply because of his skin color. He has been subjected to racism that is rarely seen in America’s professional sports, constantly watching fans wave bananas at him and referring to him as a monkey or hearing actual monkey sounds whenever he touches the ball. Upon his signing to Italian soccer powerhouse AC Milan, team official Paolo Berlusconi, the brother of former Italian President Silvio Berlusconi, referred to Balotelli as a “little black boy” (in 2008 Silvio Berlusconi famously referred to President Obama as “suntanned”). Fans from Juventus, one of the two soccer clubs in Torino, once infamously chanted, in reference to Balotelli, “There are no black Italians.” Some believed that all of this may have come to a head when Kevin Prince-Boateng, a Ghanian midfielder playing with Balotelli for AC Milan, walked off the field following racist abuse. The game was a friendly, essentially meaningless, and against a lower level team, but the action of walking off the field was far from meaningless. It signified a player and his teammates finally taking a stand, instead of simply meandering around the issue. But, the real question remained, would players take a stand during a game of significance, during a match where a spot in the standings were at stake? The answer came definitively just one month ago. During a match in Milan between AC Milan and Roma, Roma Ultras incessantly taunted both Balotelli and Boateng, forcing officials to briefly stop the game in the second half. Roma was fined $65,000. The list goes on.

To combat the issue of racism, actions cannot be confined solely to the offenders. Not everybody is chanting. Not everybody is holding banners. In fact, it is but a handful of fans. Thus, it is essential to recognize the importance of the fans who remain silent, realizing that indifference is the driving force behind soccer’s inability to rid itself of discrimination. Sepp Blatter, president of FIFA, soccer’s governing body, and a man who has never strayed far from controversy, stated in 2011 that there was no racism between players and that it could all be settled at the end of the game with a hand shake. Lazio executive Claudio Lotito, defended his team, saying it would be impossible to “control the attitude of individual fans.” There are signs that Europe is waking up to the dangers of racism, beginning with tougher penalties enacted a couple weeks ago by FIFA, but it remains to be seen what, if any, the difference will be. I listed a number of incidents, but a simple Google search can reveal I barely even scratched the surface. Racism is extensive in all of Europe and it requires an extensive response. If Europe is unwilling to take bold action to combat racism’s ubiquity it is, in essence, a tacit acceptance of its inevitability. If that is the world Europeans are content to live in, then there is little anyone else can do. Ultimately, the final decision will rest with their gaze each morning, staring at their own reflection.

It is impossible to say if the economic situation in Europe will improve but as debt continues to grow and economies continue to shrink, the outlook is bleak. If Europe continues to deteriorate, the people will elect new leaders, but worsening times leaves the inevitability of a power vacuum, ready to be filled. The issues with anti-Semitism, xenophobia, and racism are real, and show no signs of dissipating. Europe will have to face the issues head-on, acknowledging their existence and devising a strategy to eradicate them. This is no easy task, and the climb will treacherous, and will be met with vociferous opposition but the alternative may be much more dangerous.






Editor's Note: All of the information was derived from various reputable Internet sources, which I double and triple checked. In addition, a number of the events I researched came after reading Wright Thompson's brilliant piece about racism in Italian soccer. If you want information on my citations, ones which I did not link to the piece, please let me know.

The Absurdity of Stephen Hawking's Boycott

It has been reported that Stephen Hawking, the renowned and equally brilliant physicist who authored the bestseller, "A Brief History of Time", has decided to withdraw from the upcoming Presidential Conference in Israel. The Conference attracts some of the most prominent, brilliant and influential people in the world, and is hosted by Shimon Peres, Israel's Nobel Peace Prize winning President. The reason for Hawking's withdrawal is not due to his failing health, which some had reported, but rather due to his protest of Israel's treatment of the Palestinian people. Overnight Hawking has become the most notable academic to boycott the State of Israel, and in turn given credence to a movement which singles out Israel for impropriety in a region awash with moral depravity. According to a statement, Hawking's decision was based on advice from Palestinian academics who advised him to "respect" the boycott. It appears as though 'respect' is very subjective for Hawking, since his 'respect' does not apply to the myriad Israeli academics, as well as Shimon Peres, who have worked tirelessly to reach a peace agreement with the Palestinians. It is nothing less than a shameful decision.

I don't deny that Israel is imperfect. I will not deny that Israel has and continues to commit wrongs against the Palestinian people. The occupation has probably done more harm to Israel's standing in the world than nearly all other Israeli policies combined. We should work hard to end it, through diplomacy and peaceful engagement, creating a long lasting and just agreement, that will last for generations. But boycotting the entire State of Israel and cutting off communication to a State which is home to the only democracy in the Middle East? Is Israel is so terrible that Hawking cannot acknowledge that women, minorities, and homosexuals are afforded more rights in Israel than in any other country in the Middle East or that Israel is a country where freedom of speech allows you to criticize government policy freely, freedoms which don't exist in any other country in the region? What about the fact that Arab women, Muslim and Christian, are allowed to pursue an education, dress how they see fit, and serve in Parliament, all of which can be elusive in every other Arab country?

Maybe Hawking missed those facts. I understand where Hawking is coming from. He is taking a bold stand against oppression and bigotry wherever it may lay, right? He should applaud himself. Too many people stand by idly while others are denied their freedoms. But if Hawking is going to boycott Israel, why stop there? In fact, there is a whole laundry list of countries for Hawking to display his noble and courageous beliefs!

Let's start with Russia. In 2012, Hawking accepted a $3 million prize for his work with black holes from a foundation founded by Russian billionaire Yuri Milner. Milner does business and pays taxes in Russia as well as maintaining contacts with the Russian government. Thus, Hawking should take a bold and courageous stand and return the prize money. Why you ask? Russia maintains a close relationship with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and has provided weapons and money to the Syrian regime. In fact, Russia has vetoed 3 UN resolutions condemning Assad's brutal crackdown, including vetoing a resolution which plainly condemned Assad's behavior. So while 70,000 (and counting) Syrians have been murdered, Russia has not only sat by watching, but has buttressed a regime which recently used chemical weapons on its own people. But, if that doesn't bother Hawking, then he should look at the lack of press freedom in Russia. According to Reporters Without Borders, Russia ranks 148 out of 179 in the Press Freedom Index. Russian ranks among the worst in prosecuting murders of journalists, and according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, there have been 54 journalists killed since 1992, which ranks just ahead of the 48 killed during the same period in Somalia. Maybe Hawking should take a stand against the rampant election fraud that took place during Russia's most recent election, or the brutal crackdown that followed. Maybe he should complain about the imprisonment of Russian government opposition like Mikhail Khodorkovsky, who has been declared a prisoner of conscience by Amnesty International and has been imprisoned on flimsy charges since 2005. Maybe Hawking should condition his acceptance of Yuri Milner's prize money on the immediate cessation of the trial of Alexei Navalny, an opposition blogger currently facing 10 years in prison. Or maybe not.

How about China? In 2006, Hawking visited China for a conference with hundreds of physicists, speaking to an audience of thousands in Beijing's Great Hall of the People. The speech occurred right in Tiananmen Square where hundreds, and maybe thousands of civilians were murdered by government forces less than 20 years earlier. China imposes a brutal occupation on the people of Tibet, who have protested by self immolating themselves. In 2012, according to Human Rights Watch, 72 Tibetans lit themselves on fire to protest China's rule. China is also a good friend of Russia in the UN. Not only has Russia vetoed three UN resolutions condemning the Syrian regime, but China has joined suit, stating, in defense of its veto, that the resolution was "seriously problematic, with uneven content that is intended to put pressure on only one party". I'm sure the Syrian people would agree. What about the unbearable conditions that Chinese workers must endure, resulting in rampant suicides, which protest the miserable hours and non-existent pay?  But if that doesn't bother Hawking, then he should send a nice note to Liu Xiaobo, who is imprisoned for supporting human rights, or speak to Chen Guangchen, a blind activist, who escaped China to come to the United States out of fear for his life.

But if Hawking really wants to take a stand and show some courage, there is one other country that he should boycott, a country which honored Hawking with the Presidential Medal of Freedom; the great United States of America. If Hawking wishes to support human rights everywhere, then how about he take a trip to Guantanamo Bay where detainees are being force fed through their noses because of  hunger strikes, undertaken to protest being indefinitely detained without trial. Hawking can talk to a man named Khaled El-Masri, a German citizen, who was mistakenly believed to be a terrorist suspect. El-Masri was held by the CIA for four months, tortured and sodomized, and left on the side of the road. Hawking should express his outrage at the invasion of Iraq, which has now killed at least, and likely more, than 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians. He can even visit Iraq and see the aftermath of the invasion, which has resulted in a huge upsurge in birth defects and deformities, which some have attributed to depleted uranium and white phosphorous used by the United States. And if Hawking chooses to boycott America because of its decision to invade Iraq, then he might want to stay away from his home in England, since it was England who came to the aid of the United States, partnering in the invasion of Iraq. The list goes on.

This movement, to boycott Israel, is a staple of many Palestinian activists as well as those on the far-left fringes of the political spectrum. The movement is loud, but its truculence is the movement's only real asset. There is simply no substance or veracity to any of the movement's charges, which is the main reason it has gained almost no traction in the United States. The biggest proponents of the movement are likely to be found in the Middle East, in which numerous countries do not allow those with Israeli (Jewish Israeli) passports and where the Arab League began boycotting Jewish businesses nearly seven decades ago. It is not fair to call the movement or Stephen Hawking anti-Semitic, but there are certainly elements of the movement whose motivations are dubious at best.

What is so upsetting about Hawking's decision is that it only harms the peace process. A boycott establishes the idea that one side bears responsibility and blame for a set of circumstances, thus establishing Israel as the sole contributor to the plight of the Palestinian people. Hawking appears to have discarded the roles that Arab countries have played in this conflict, refusing to recognize the existence of Israel while perpetuating a cycle of enmity between the two sides. Do the Palestinians bear no blame? Is indiscriminately killing civilians through suicide attacks targeting buses, restaurants, and night clubs not an impediment to peace? Is firing rockets, in an attempt to terrorize and injure as many civilians as possible, something that does not warrant condemnation? The only way to end this conflict is through negotiation and an acceptance of the other's right to exist; two states living peacefully side by side. And as reports surface that Russia is supplying the Syrian regime with advanced cruise missiles, as more and more civilians die every day, Stephen Hawking is nowhere to be found.

The Day Boston Changed Forever

I spent hours sitting on my bed, into the wee hours of Monday night, writing sentence after sentence after sentence. I was trying to determine the best way to start this piece, how best to grab the readers' attention, as if this was like any other piece of writing. I began writing about the unexplainable captivation of Boston. I used the phrases "enigmatic aura" and "mythological stature". I tried to craft a perfect opening and hours later found myself at the same place I started. During the course of that near sleepless Monday night, my emotions swung back and forth, a pendulum of shock, disbelief, sadness, and anger. I simply couldn't write anything down. Each time I did another emotion would surface, drowning out the other. Monday was supposed to be joyous and celebratory. Even from many miles away in Washington D.C. and even though there was no public holiday, I was excited; Marathon Monday in Boston is easily the best day of the year.

It started out like any other Monday. I had class in the morning and then Criminal Law beginning at 1:30 and ending at 2:50. During class I would peek at the Red Sox score, letting out a small and only slightly noticeable fist pump when Mike Napoli hit a game winning double. And as class ended at 2:50, the same time the explosions occurred, the exuberance that lit up my face quickly turned to confusion as the news trickled in. I had planned to meet with a Professor but I rushed home instead, watching the news, attempting to make sense of a nonsensical event. This was so personal, so close to my heart, and the hearts of anyone who has lived or spent time in Boston. This day was, for lack of a better word, sacred.

And then I saw the blast, the horrid video from the finish line, the sound of the explosion, the screaming, the blood, the horror, my feelings so visceral that I couldn't help but gasp. And then I saw the boy, Martin Richard, that young and beautiful child, with a wide smile, big brown eyes, and those pre-braces teeth, the picture of carefree innocence, holding up a sign for peace. The wall holding my emotion quickly crumbled as the salty and bitter tears streamed down my face. I remember sitting in my bed on Monday night, my eyes red and puffy, flinching when I heard the door close, then closing my eyes, reminding myself to breathe. Deep, easy breaths, just one at a time.

Why Boston? Why the Marathon? Why this day? There were simply no answers to the innumerable questions. I have been to the Marathon. I have walked those very streets, the very spots where the explosions occurred, more times than I can count. Sometimes, I would take the train into Back Bay Station, walk down Dartmouth Street, cross Boylston Street at the intersection just a few hundred feet from where the first explosion occurred, continuing on through Newbury Street and its expensive shopping, through Commonwealth Avenue's tree-lined walkway marveling at its pristine beauty, and then crossing over Storrow Drive, to the Esplanade, looking out over the Charles River to Cambridge, watching the sun slowly set. There is little that can top it.

Boston is a city that makes no sense yet makes perfect sense; a city of anomalies and paradoxes. It's a city that is nearly impossible to drive in with its roads appearing to have been designed by a small infant after being given his first coloring book. Its mayor, its stumbling, bumbling, goofball of a human, who can't stand on his feet or pronounce the names of the city's most famous athletes, yet is beloved by the city and  is easily re-elected each time he runs. Its subway system, built 100 years ago, seemingly unchanged or improved, leaving riders pleasantly surprised when it works properly. Its most notorious residents, filled with dropped "r's" and intolerance, ambivalent to outsiders or change, harboring a penchant for alcohol consumption, yet living in the heart and capital of arguably the most tolerant, educated, progressive, and liberal state in the country, home to some of the greatest institutions in the world. Its nightlife, or lack thereof, closing while other cities are just beginning, the subway shutting down just as you are going out, leaving you to find a non-existent cabby who doesn't take credit cards or have a sense of direction. Fenway Park, its beloved baseball stadium, plopped tightly and awkwardly near Kenmore Square, where ticket prices are the highest in the league buying you a seat which fits maybe half of your body, where a pretzel may run you $5, where the bathrooms overflow, and yet you can't help but be transfixed by its ambiance, magic, and transcendent beauty. The history of the city sitting at every street corner, innocuous landmarks quietly hiding in plain sight, reminders of the iconic events in this city's history which helped propel America to independence; The Old North Church, The Boston Tea Party, Bunker Hill, and the other Boston Massacre. I don't know what the Marathon will be like next year, and in the years to come. It will most assuredly never be the same. But there is something about Boston, something I cannot pin-point, something, like the city itself, that I cannot explain, something deep inside me which knows that Boston will refuse to let this affect us.

Many people leave the city when they are young. They may move to New York or, like me, to D.C., where the streets make sense and the public transportation works. But sometimes I think of Boston. I think of the times waiting for the subway at Downtown Crossing on a hot summer day, the smells wafting through the air, hearing the groans from the commuters, as an announcement about mechanical problems delays your departure. I think of shaking my head angrily, sweat trickling down my face, as another commuter knocks into me, seemingly unaware that I was standing there. But one day I will return, and I will sit in Downtown Crossing during that summer day and I will smile. I will smile because I would simply have it no other way. Because just as it's certain I will return, so will Boylston Street, so will this great city, so will Patriots Day, and so will the Marathon. We would have it no other way.

The Obscenity of the NCAA

NCAA President Mark Emmert

Rutgers' Coach Mike Rice

Arizona Coach Sean Miller

Over the past couple days two major stories have emerged from the magical world of College Basketball. First, it was revealed that Ed Rush, the Pac-12 Head of Officiating, told a group of referees he would offer $5000 or a trip to Cancun if they rang up (whistled him for a technical foul) Arizona head coach, Sean Miller. Second, a haunting and disturbing report from Outside the Lines showed Rugters' head coach Mike Rice throwing basketballs and swearing at players during practice. Larry Scott, the Pac-12 commissioner, and Tim Pernetti, Rutgers' Athletic Director, disciplined both men, discipline that allowed both men to keep their job. Rush was reprimanded, which essentially means nothing. Rice was suspended three games earlier this season and fined $50,000, which is essentially nothing. These stories will almost certainly continue to evolve, and if I were to surmise, I would bet that Rutgers, being a public university, will ultimately fire Mike Rice in the coming days, or he will resign. As for Ed Rush, I would say him losing his job is far from a certainty, since the public outcry will be far less vitriolic towards him than to Rice. The people most and almost exclusively offended by Rush are sports fans (and University of Arizona students and alumni) while those offended by Rice include every person on Earth, except for maybe Mel Gibson.

I don't know much about Ed Rush. I do know that Marc Cuban said in 2002 he wouldn't hire Rush to "manage a Dairy Queen".  But up until this controversy I had never heard his name before. But I will not soon forget it. So much is wrong with this situation, I find myself trying to muster some semblance of coherent thought in a feeble attempt to describe my emotions. Am I sad? disappointed? angry? bewildered? shocked? For sports fans, this epitomizes our worst fears. Sports are so special because they are (or are supposed to be) some of the only elements of truth in the world. Sports are not supposed to be affected by the outside world. With all the terrible things we see on the news every day, sport endures as a symbol of fairness and impartiality. May the best man win. Plain and simple. Beauty in its purest form. But sports are not immune to the vices of the outside world. So when those tasked with overseeing the impartiality of the game, the referees, compromise the integrity of the game, the anger that results is often impassioned and fierce. After all a referee is "an official who watches a game or a match closely to ensure that the rules are adhered". Ed Rush has not just compromised the integrity of the game, he has destroyed it. The first action should have been his immediate dismissal, yet almost as shocking as the comments themselves, Larry Scott, the Pac-12 commissioner, has not fired Rush. Instead Scott decided to speak about the situation and made some of the most perplexing comments I have ever heard.

Scott said, among other things, that he did not find a "breach of ethics or integrity in the officiating program" and that there was "nothing individual about Sean Miller in all of this". Really Larry? What Ed rush said was ethical? If there was no breach of integrity, would you say that this incident has espoused confidence in Pac-12 officiating? Does this behavior embody the rectitude that is expected of Pac-12 officiating? What planet is Larry Scott on? What occurred is actually the opposite of Ed Rush's job description. His job is to oversee the officials to ensure the integrity and impartiality of the game remains. I'm not sure how Ed Rush could have fucked up worse. It's like a doctor who makes a patient sicker or a teacher who makes a student dumber. And then to say that Sean Miller wasn't targeted? Sean Miller received a technical foul, his first of the entire season for telling the official that his player "touched the ball". The question we need to ask is whether Sean Miller receives this technical in any other situation. I think the answer is emphatically, no. And while Scott admitted the comments were inappropriate, he in essence excused them by saying they were simply made "in jest". Does that even matter? At the time of the technical there was 4:37 left in the game. Mark Lyons was called for a double dribble, which was the incorrect call, as the defender touched the ball. Miller protested and received a technical. UCLA made two free throws. UCLA would win the game by two points. Ed Rush's comments affected the outcome of the game. Even Larry Scott is dumb enough to know basic math, I think.

 Mike Rice is another name I had never heard of until yesterday. I guess that's what happens when you are the basketball coach at Rutgers. Earlier in the basketball season, in mid-December, Rice was suspended for three games and fined $50,000 for what were, at the time, unknown offenses. The reality of that suspension came to light yesterday when Outside the Lines released video of Rice throwing basketballs at players and berating them with offensive slurs. The video is shocking and thus explains why Rutgers acted so surreptitiously during the initial suspension. The Rutgers A.D. said at the time, "there was obviously some things that are not to the Rutgers' standard that we evaluated and decided upon". Really? How about some things not up to the human standard? Mike Rice called his players pussies, bitches, cunts, motherfuckers, and faggots. He threw a ball at one of his players' heads. He aggressively put his hands on players, pushing and grabbing them. A college basketball coach is an educator and a role model, who is charged with setting an example for impressionable 18-22 year old young men, many of whom lack a strong familial structure. Not only does he fail that test, he might not even meet the criteria for world's worst dad. But as seems the tradition in NCAA athletics, those in charge seem to be the one's most in need of edification, like Rutgers A.D. Tim Pernetti.

Pernetti was interviewed on Outside the Lines and was pressed on the leniency of the discipline. Pernetti mentioned that the tape shown was not a full representation and that it is important to look at those incidents in full context. Might I inquire as to what context you are referring to? Because there is no place whatsoever for that type of behavior on a basketball court. Ever. But most bewildering was Pernetti's logic that this was simply a first offense. Maybe if you add up every incident together it was a first offense. Rice didn't simply hurl one ball at a player's head or call one player a pussy, he did it over and over and over again. According to the report, at least three players transferred due to his actions, and one player, Gilvydas Biruta, who is from Lithuania, was called a "Lithuanian faggot". Maybe if you took one of those incidents such as throwing a ball once, or yelling an epithet once, I would consider it a first offense. But not this. This is multiple offenses that Pernetti rolled into one to support his morally reprehensible penalty. Three games? $50,000? To put that in context, Shabazz Muhammad missed three games for accepting impermissible benefits ranging from $500-$700 during recruiting trips. And Mike Rice makes approximately $700,000, so $50,000 is approximately 1/14th of his salary. Sounds fair to me.

The bigger picture regarding both of these stories is the same pervasive themes that has led to the inexorable decline of the NCAA and its credibility. Players simply don't matter. They mean nothing. And it literally gets shoved into our faces over and over again. Those stupid NCAA commercials which show how the NCAA is always there for its pawns student-athletes. While the NCAA signs huge contracts, like the one in 2010 for 10.8 Billion (no, that is not a typo), its players are held at the mercy of coaches who are free to leave their university on a whim (it's usually for more money). Because when Gilvydas Biruta was called a "Lithuanian faggot" the only fair thing to do would be to make him sit out a year, which he did. While Mike Rice sat out three games, Birutas sat out the entire season. Seems logical, right? But logic means nothing to the NCAA. Remember Mike Leach? The Texas Tech football coach who put his player in an electrical closet. After being fired Leach signed a deal with Washington State which paid him over 2 Million Dollars per year. Naturally, he was accused of abusing his players in his first season at Washington State. There has been reported abuse all over the country. Just last month, University of Utah swim coach, Greg Winslow, was told his contract would not be renewed after allegations surfaced of sexual abuse, along with claims that the University did not do enough to protect its players from the abuse. The list goes on.

Scandals in collegiate athletics have become as ubiquitous as the competitions themselves. Players are helpless as they are left with nowhere to turn, while coaches and administrators are left accountable to no one. The truth is that in a month we will forget about Ed Rush and Mike Rice. No one will remember Larry Scott or Tim Pernetti. But I can assure you, with the utmost certainty, the scandals will continue. The names will be different. The stories will change, but only slightly; the idea is the same. The coaches with their exorbitant salaries will become more indispensable, and the players more inconsequential. The NCAA ostensibly represents the body which protects players but any action by the NCAA starts and ends with the movement of their lips. At the end of the NCAA's new March Madness commercial they say, "just know we're always there for student-athletes". And then something caught my glance outside the window. I looked quickly to see a pig flying through the air.


Editors Note** Mike Rice was fired this morning (4/3). I guess I can see into the future.**